Photo by Adobe Stock Photos

Most first-time owners open their profit and loss statement expecting a single number to tell them how they are doing. That number does not exist. Investopedia defines it plainly: a P&L summarizes revenues, costs and expenses over a specific period and shows a company's ability to generate profit by increasing revenue, reducing costs or both. It follows a fixed order: revenue at the top, costs subtracted in stages, profit at the bottom.

Corporate Finance Institute breaks that order into its core categories: revenue, cost of goods sold, SG&A expenses, interest, taxes and net income. Reading a P&L well means watching how much survives each stage, not just the final line. A business can grow revenue every month and still watch profit flatten, and the P&L is the only document that shows exactly where that erosion is happening.

SCORE, the nonprofit small-business mentoring network partnered with the US Small Business Administration, emphasizes that financial statements help small-business owners monitor financial health, track changes in revenue, costs and profitability, and make informed decisions. For a new owner, that means focusing on a few key ratios rather than trying to interpret every line at once. Margins are particularly useful because they show how much of each dollar of revenue survives at different stages of the P&L.

Benchmarks make those ratios meaningful, but only against the right peer group. According to NYU Stern's Damodaran margin dataset, one of the most widely cited industry financial databases among analysts and academics, the total US market outside financial firms runs a 34.39% average gross margin and an 8.56% average net margin. Business and consumer services average closer to 33% gross and 7% net. A new owner comparing their numbers to the wrong industry is measuring against a business that does not resemble their own.

None of this requires an accounting degree. It requires checking the same few things every month. Is gross margin holding steady? Is the gap between gross and net profit growing? How does this month compare to last? The P&L will not tell a new owner what to do next. It will tell them, clearly and early, whether the business they built is actually working.

Photo by Adobe Stock Photos

Most companies treat culture like something fragile to be guarded during an acquisition or a period of rapid growth. The Employee Experience Project makes a strong case for flipping that instinct. Growth and new ownership do not just put culture at risk. They change what the company actually needs culture to do. The operators and sponsors who understand that distinction going in are the ones who come out with a workforce that still works on the other side.

1. Do the culture due diligence before the deal closes. Kreischer Miller's talent advisory practice treats culture as its own diligence category alongside financial and legal review. In practice that means interviewing leadership and top performers separately to see whether their version of the company's core values actually aligns, mapping informal norms and unwritten routines that never appear in a mission statement and auditing what promises were made to employees around compensation, promotions and benefits. New leadership should not be blindsided by expectations they did not know existed.

2. Reset the deal. Do not just announce it. Ambiguity is what destabilizes culture, not change itself. During an acquisition, leaders need to define a new shared cultural standard, decide whose norms take precedence where there is overlap and be direct with employees about what the new arrangement actually is rather than leaving people to guess. Once a company outgrows founder-led informality, roles, communication channels and decision-making authority need to be made explicit rather than assumed.

3. Audit leadership before you blame culture. What gets labeled culture drift during a growth phase or post-acquisition is often a leadership gap being exposed. Leaders who manage well by proximity start to struggle once delegation and decentralized decision-making become the norm. Culture initiatives that do not come with a real leadership capability audit tend to fall flat for exactly this reason.

4. Make communication go both ways. A CEO who has navigated two acquisitions totaling $325 million in enterprise value, writing in Forbes Australia, makes the case for town halls, genuine transparency across formal and informal channels and actually soliciting employee feedback rather than just announcing structural changes. Giving employees a say in what projects they work on post-acquisition so they feel ownership in the new company rather than just absorbing whatever happens to them is a tactic worth adopting.

5. Engineer an ownership culture. KKR's research with Gallup found that 97% of employees who feel like owners and are engaged plan to stay, compared to just 47% of highly engaged employees without any ownership stake. KKR has rolled out broad-based equity grants across more than 40 portfolio companies touching over 100,000 families, paired with financial literacy training and transparent performance metrics. Culture retention under new PE ownership can be engineered rather than left to chance.

Culture does not survive rapid growth or new ownership by being shielded from change. It survives because leaders are deliberate about what they keep, what they reset and how honestly they communicate that difference to the people living through it.

Photo by Brian Jiang

Brian Jiang is the founder of DealDogs, an AI-powered platform that helps private equity firms, independent sponsors, searchers and intermediaries identify off-market SMB acquisition targets and likely sellers. Before founding DealDogs, Brian worked in investment banking at Greenhill and private equity at Searchlight Capital Partners. We sat down with him to discuss what proprietary sourcing actually means, why timing matters more than most deal teams admit and how lean firms can use AI without automating away the relationships that make transactions happen.

WestGate Partners: You went from Greenhill to Searchlight to venture to founder. What does that path give you sitting across from a business broker that a pure deal-sourcing background wouldn't, and what do you still have to learn from them?

Brian Jiang: At a large institution, you inherit a lot more infrastructure than you initially realize. You have the firm's brand, years of transaction history, existing relationships and partners who have been talking to companies and advisors for decades. It can make sourcing look like an individual activity when a lot of it is really institutional compounding. The long tail of the SMB market is very different. A broker, searcher or independent sponsor is often building that infrastructure for themselves from day one, so there is a real cold-start problem: Who do I talk to, why should they talk to me and how do I stay relevant over time? What I have learned from good brokers is that proprietary deal flow is ultimately relationship-driven. Technology can help you find the right people, start more relevant conversations and keep track of hundreds of relationships, but it cannot manufacture trust.

WGP: Before you'd built a single feature, what told you that off-market SMB deal flow was broken rather than just annoying?

BJ: Funny enough, we did not start with sourcing. We initially built around AI document generation, including CIMs, teasers and similar materials, and there was definitely a need there, but it also became pretty clear that general-purpose AI was going to absorb a lot of basic document creation. So we went back to users and asked where the bigger constraint was, and sourcing kept coming up. Saving a week on a CIM is valuable, but you need a deal to work on before any of that matters. The challenge was not simply finding a list of businesses. Information was fragmented, contact data could be stale and it was difficult to know which companies actually fit or which owners might be worth speaking with. A list of companies is not deal flow. Deal flow starts when you can identify the right businesses, reach the right people and create a repeatable way to stay in front of that market. Once we focused there, the reception was just dramatically stronger.

WGP: A sponsor says their deal flow is proprietary. What do you actually check to know if that's true or just a nicer word for "we got the same email as everyone else"?

BJ: I don't think proprietary search is binary. A company can be off-market without the relationship itself being proprietary, and multiple buyers can independently find the same business. I would look at whether the relationship existed before the owner decided to run a process, whether there is actually a reason that owner would want to speak with this specific buyer and whether the team can reproduce that pipeline rather than relying on one lucky introduction. Usually the advantage is some combination of timing, context and credibility. Maybe you reached the owner earlier, know their industry or geography extremely well, have done similar deals or simply stayed in touch long enough that you're the first call when something changes. Technology can help you put more lines in the water and maintain those relationships at scale, but sending someone a personalized email does not suddenly make the relationship proprietary. The human connection still has to happen.

WGP: You've talked about buyers, sellers and intermediaries all operating on different timelines. What's the most common way that mismatch actually kills a deal that was otherwise good on paper?

BJ: Everyone is working backward from something different. A buyer may have a search runway, a deployment period or a mandate and generally has the ability to walk away if a deal does not fit. A seller's timeline is much more fluid. Someone might think they're five or ten years from selling and then a family issue, burnout, an unsolicited offer or some other event changes that overnight. Meanwhile, the intermediary is often playing the longest game because a good advisor may know an owner for years before there is ever a mandate. Where people get into trouble is trying to force everyone onto their own timeline, whether a buyer pushes too hard, a seller waits until they're under pressure or an advisor hears "not now" and stops following up. A "not now" from a good owner is not a permanent no. A lot of proprietary deal flow is simply staying relevant long enough that you're there when "not now" eventually becomes "let's talk."

WGP: The ETA and search fund space has gotten a lot louder over the past few years. Is the actual deal flow keeping pace, or is more capital chasing the same off-market businesses?

BJ: There is definitely more attention and more buyer activity chasing the same pool of attractive businesses. Stanford's latest study shows how much the search ecosystem has grown, but it also shows that acquiring a company has not necessarily gotten easier: the long-run acquisition rate is 58%, while only about half of the 2021 through 2024 search-fund cohorts had acquired a business as of the latest study. The important distinction is quality. There are millions of small businesses, but there are far fewer with strong financials, transferable customer relationships, limited owner dependence and enough earnings to support the transaction a buyer wants to do. So I still think it comes back to access and timing. The opportunity is there, but you have to get in front of the right owner when the business is ready, the owner is ready and you are credible enough to actually get something done.

WGP: What's a widely repeated stat or narrative about the SMB M&A boom, whether succession wave, silver tsunami or something else, that you think is overstated?

BJ: Probably the Silver Tsunami. I don't think the demographic trend is wrong; I think people confuse the number of owners who will retire with the number of attractive businesses that will actually transact. McKinsey estimates that roughly six million SMBs could face an ownership transition by 2035, but only a little over one million are likely to be viable candidates for a sale or employee-ownership transition. A company can support an owner and a number of employees for decades and still not be particularly transferable. It might depend entirely on the founder, have messy financials, lack management underneath them or simply be too small. So the Silver Tsunami is real in the sense that there is a massive succession issue coming. I just think the investable wave is much narrower than the demographic wave, and the best businesses within that group are still going to attract a lot of competition.

WGP: Independent sponsors and business brokers are being told they need AI in their workflow. What's the honest version of what that means for a two-person shop doing a handful of deals a year, and what it doesn't mean?

BJ: For a two-person firm, your biggest constraint is usually time, so AI can be a huge source of leverage. But I would actually start with the boring stuff. If you're not e-signing NDAs, using a CRM, organizing documents properly or automating basic follow-ups, you probably don't need to jump straight to building some autonomous AI agent. Where AI gets really useful is on structured, repetitive work where the first answer doesn't need to be the final answer: researching companies, screening a buy box, organizing diligence, doing a first pass through financials or helping a broker qualify buyers. What it doesn't mean is automating every judgment or every interaction. Outreach is a great example. AI can help with research and personalization, but owners can tell when something sounds robotic. Ideally AI gives you more time to actually talk to people and build relationships. It should make a lean firm more human, not less.

WGP: You built DealDogs for high-velocity teams working the LMM and SMB end of the market. What does a deal at that size need from a sourcing tool that an enterprise-scale search doesn't, and where do sponsors get that wrong?

BJ: The biggest difference is that the further down-market you go, the messier the information gets. A $500 million company has bankers covering it, a management team on LinkedIn, institutional databases tracking it and years of readily available information. A $5 million family-owned business might have a basic website, a state license, a few Google reviews and an owner whose name appears almost nowhere. So the problem becomes much more about stitching together fragmented information and doing it across a very large universe. At the same time, I think sponsors sometimes confuse having more names with having better sourcing. You still need to narrow that universe based on what actually fits, understand enough context to have a relevant conversation and then build the relationship from there. Technology should let a lean team cover far more ground without turning the process into mass spam. That's the balance that matters.

WGP: DealDogs recently became a preferred partner of Transworld Business Advisors. What did that opportunity mean to you, and what did it teach you about building for this market?

BJ: It was a pretty meaningful full-circle moment because our first customer was actually a Transworld advisor. We got to learn from those users very early, including what information was actually useful, what workflows took too much time and, frankly, what sounded good in a product demo but did not help someone generate a real conversation. The preferred-partner relationship came from continuing to listen, fixing things, adding features people asked for and ultimately having advisors within the organization willing to vouch for us. We're incredibly grateful for that. Transworld is the world's largest business brokerage, so it is obviously a meaningful vote of confidence, but I think of it as one brick, albeit a pretty big one, in a much larger house we're building. We work with intermediaries as well as PE firms, independent sponsors and searchers on the buy side, and ultimately we want to build infrastructure that helps this whole ecosystem transact more effectively.

WGP: Three years from now, is DealDogs still selling deal flow tools, or has the product become something else entirely?

BJ: Sourcing will always be core because it is literally the top of the funnel. Brokers want potential sellers and qualified buyers, while searchers, independent sponsors and PE firms want acquisition targets. Nothing else happens until that first relevant conversation exists. But I also think a lot of good software companies start by doing one painful thing really well and then follow their users from there. The longer-term vision for DealDogs is to become the operating system for small-business transactions, helping a lean team move from identifying an opportunity through managing relationships, coordinating parties, organizing diligence and eventually financing and closing the deal. The point is not to automate the judgment out of M&A. It is to give a one- or two-person shop infrastructure that historically required a lot more headcount. People spend a lot of time talking about how hard it is to find a business, but once you buy it, you still have to run the damn thing. That's when the real work starts.

Investors, intermediaries and operators can reach Brian directly by connecting with him at brian@dealdogs.ai or visiting dealdogs.ai to learn more.

WestGate Partners (WGP) is an independent sponsor focused on acquiring and growing lower middle market businesses in residential and commercial services. We bring institutional experience, tailored capital with hands-on partnership to help owners transition, grow and preserve their legacy. By partnering with strong operators, we build enduring businesses in economically-insulated industries.